AssembleMe is an information science blog written by Julius Schorzman that frequently sways off-topic.

Julius is the CEO of the Google Ventures backed company DailyCred. DailyCred makes working with OAuth super duper simple.

To view some of my old projects, visit Shopobot or CodeCodex.

You can follow me on Twitter if you really want to @schorzman.

Contact Me
This form does not yet contain any fields.
    « South Asia Data | Main | The Year In Ideas »

    Google's Strategy; Microsoft's Stratagem

    INFO SCIENCE: Yesterday I was reading an article over lunch that was fawning over MSN Search's new entry point in the new MSN Instant Messenger interface. In short, the article seemed to suggest that Microsoft would eventually win the search wars because they are able to put "Search The Web" boxes in all of their different software products. (Google is doomed, doomed!)

    But this morning I hear on NPR that Google Print is going to add the works of nearly a half-dozen major libraries to their search results, an amazing feat to say the least.

    This really strikes at the difference between the two companies' current strategies for gaining market share. One company seems to rely predominantly on its weight as a monopolist in other fields, while one company really attempts to add value. I'll let you guess which one is which.

    Speaking of Google, have you played with Keyhole yet? If not, please do so right away.

    UPDATE: The Shifted Librarian points us to a few interesting stats about Google's new project:

  • "A quick calculation using the figures above suggests an average scan rate of 3200 volumes per day (assuming 365 days/year for 6 years) at the University of Michigan site alone." [Tito Sierra on the WEB4LIB mailing list]

  • "An even quicker calculation shows that they will need to digitize 2.25 books a minute, 24 hours/day, 365 days/year to digitize 7 million volumes in six years." [Roy Tennant on the WEB4LIB mailing list]

  • References (12)

    References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.

    Reader Comments

    There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

    PostPost a New Comment

    Enter your information below to add a new comment.

    My response is on my own website »
    Author Email (optional):
    Author URL (optional):
    Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>